https://www.simsports.sainio.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Recruit_Overview_S42 2026-04-21T12:12:32Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.26.2 https://www.simsports.sainio.org/wiki/index.php?title=Recruit_Overview_S42&diff=2316&oldid=prev 2007-04-13T23:19:02Z

<p>New page: Recruit Rankings and preseason evaluation 17/17: Milwaukee 33/11: St Louis 42/20: Cincinnati 50/40: Youngstown 21/85: Dayton 128/100: Peoria 183/219: Pontiac 246/250: Sioux ...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Recruit Rankings and preseason evaluation<br /> <br /> 17/17: Milwaukee <br /> <br /> 33/11: St Louis <br /> <br /> 42/20: Cincinnati <br /> <br /> 50/40: Youngstown <br /> <br /> 21/85: Dayton <br /> <br /> 128/100: Peoria <br /> <br /> 183/219: Pontiac <br /> <br /> 246/250: Sioux City <br /> <br /> <br /> Up in the North, Dayton should be good for another year of success. Their best players are in their SR and JR classes, and they have a freshman who seems to fit the same mold as all their previously successful SFs. Cincy continues to land bland recruits with surprisingly-high rankings, and should tread water in 2nd. Peoria needs to find a way to exploit their talent while compensating for their relative lack of depth; with Rafael Mace a senior, this might be a do-or-die year. <br /> <br /> <br /> With St Louis likely to drop off and Milwaukee picking up a near-ideal class to complement their big men, C16-South could undergo a shift in power in the near future. Youngstown maintains the talent to stay competitive, but hasn&#039;t added any impact players to really draw into contention for 1st. Pontiac Sucks.</div>

Blalock